<ONIXDOISerialArticleWorkRegistrationMessage xmlns:cl="http://www.medra.org/DOIMetadata/2.0/Citations" xmlns="http://www.editeur.org/onix/DOIMetadata/2.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.editeur.org/onix/DOIMetadata/2.0 http://www.medra.org/schema/onix/DOIMetadata/2.0/ONIX_DOIMetadata_2.0.xsd">
  <Header>
    <FromCompany>Civil and Geoengineering Letters</FromCompany>
    <FromPerson>Editorial Office</FromPerson>
    <FromEmail>info@jcivilgeo.com</FromEmail>
    <ToCompany>mEDRA</ToCompany>
    <SentDate>20260525</SentDate>
    <MessageNote>DOI Registration</MessageNote>
    <NotificationResponse>01</NotificationResponse>
  </Header>
  <DOISerialArticleWork>
    <NotificationType>06</NotificationType>
    <DOI>10.22034/CGEL.3.1.e100059</DOI>
    <DOIWebsiteLink>https://jcivilgeo.com/article/e100059</DOIWebsiteLink>
    <RegistrantName>Civil and Geoengineering Letters</RegistrantName>
    <RegistrationAuthority>mEDRA</RegistrationAuthority>
    <SerialPublication>
      <SerialWork>
        <Title>
          <TitleType>01</TitleType>
          <TitleText>Civil and Geoengineering Letters</TitleText>
        </Title>
        <Title>
          <TitleType>05</TitleType>
          <TitleText>CGEL</TitleText>
        </Title>
        <Publisher>
          <PublishingRole>01</PublishingRole>
          <PublisherIdentifier>
            <PublisherIDType>01</PublisherIDType>
            <IDValue>3115-8129</IDValue>
          </PublisherIdentifier>
          <PublisherName>Civil and Geoengineering Letters Editorial Office</PublisherName>
        </Publisher>
        <CountryOfPublication>IR</CountryOfPublication>
      </SerialWork>
      <SerialVersion>
        <ProductIdentifier>
          <ProductIDType>01</ProductIDType>
          <IDValue>3115-8129</IDValue>
        </ProductIdentifier>
        <ProductForm>JB</ProductForm>
      </SerialVersion>
    </SerialPublication>
    <JournalIssue>
      <JournalVolumeNumber>3</JournalVolumeNumber>
      <JournalIssueNumber>1</JournalIssueNumber>
      <JournalIssueDate>
        <DateFormat>01</DateFormat>
        <Date>202605</Date>
      </JournalIssueDate>
    </JournalIssue>
    <ContentItem>
      <SequenceNumber>1</SequenceNumber>
      <Title>
        <TitleType>01</TitleType>
        <TitleText>Effect of a Soil Buffer Layer on the Seismic Response of Rocking-Based Isolation Systems in Soft Soil</TitleText>
      </Title>
      <Contributor>
        <SequenceNumber>1</SequenceNumber>
        <ContributorRole>A01</ContributorRole>
        <PersonName>Ali Ghaffarnezhad Parto</PersonName>
        <PersonNameInverted>Ghaffarnezhad Parto, Ali</PersonNameInverted>
        <NamesBeforeKey>Ali</NamesBeforeKey>
        <KeyNames>Ghaffarnezhad Parto</KeyNames>
      </Contributor>
      <Language>
        <LanguageRole>01</LanguageRole>
        <LanguageCode>eng</LanguageCode>
      </Language>
      <PublicationDate>202605</PublicationDate>
      <TextContent>
        <TextType>03</TextType>
        <ContentAudience>00</ContentAudience>
        <Text>Rocking isolation systems founded on soft soils commonly exhibit settlement-dominated responses, leading to accumulated plastic strains and degradation of recentering capacity. Although ground improvement elements reduce total settlement, direct footing–improvement element induces localized stress concentrations that may hinder stable rocking behavior. This study investigates the influence of introducing an intermediate soil layer between the shallow foundation and the improvement elements on seismic response characteristics. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite difference model is developed to simulate a 3 m × 3 m shallow footing supported by discrete pile groups and diaphragm wall systems. A granular sand layer, defined as a soil buffer, is inserted between the footing and the improvement elements. Buffer thicknesses of 0, 60 cm (B/5), and 100 cm (B/3) are evaluated through parametric analysis. The results indicate that increasing buffer thickness reduces peak rotational amplitude; in the pile-supported configuration, rotation decreases from 0.121 rad (no buffer) to 0.083 rad for a 100 cm buffer. While the presence of the buffer increases residual settlement relative to direct-contact systems, increasing it from 2.2 cm to 5.5 cm in JG-PR, settlement remains significantly lower than the unimproved condition (13.6 cm). Among the examined cases, a thickness of 60 cm (B/5) provides the most favorable balance between rotation control and recentering, with the diaphragm wall system (JG-PR-SB60) achieving a recentering ratio of 0.987. The findings demonstrate that the buffer layer modifies the contact stress transfer mechanism, promoting distributed shear deformation within the interface zone and reducing localized bearing concentration at improvement elements.</Text>
      </TextContent>
      <Subject>
        <SubjectSchemeIdentifier>20</SubjectSchemeIdentifier>
        <SubjectHeadingText>Soil layer; Rocking isolation; Soft soil; Granular soil; Recentering ratio</SubjectHeadingText>
      </Subject>
      <Dates>
        <DateRole>01</DateRole>
        <DateFormat>00</DateFormat>
        <Date>20260210</Date>
      </Dates>
      <Dates>
        <DateRole>02</DateRole>
        <DateFormat>00</DateFormat>
        <Date>20260420</Date>
      </Dates>
      <CopyrightStatement>
        <CopyrightYear>2026</CopyrightYear>
        <CopyrightOwner>
          <PersonName>Ali Ghaffarnezhad Parto</PersonName>
        </CopyrightOwner>
      </CopyrightStatement>
    </ContentItem>
  </DOISerialArticleWork>
</ONIXDOISerialArticleWorkRegistrationMessage>
